1. 研究目的与意义（文献综述包含参考文献）
[摘要]：2018年3月，《监察法》出台，同年10月，《刑事诉讼法》做出相应的修改，规定了监察委员会的监察权限、监察范围、监察程序，明确区分了监察委员会和人民检察院的监督对象和职权范围。新《刑事诉讼法》虽然对监察委员会和检察院的职能衔接问题做了相应的规定，但也存在的问题：具体而言，即两法存在立法的不协调、不一致和立法中的相对缺失等问题。因此，为了解决实践层面中存在的监察委员会和检察院衔接不畅问题，实现高效顺畅衔接，需要进一步完善相关衔接机制的构建。
[关键词]：监察委员会，衔接，调查权，审查起诉
abstract：inmarch 2018, the supervision law was promulgated, and in october of the sameyear, the criminal procedure law was amended accordingly, stipulating thesupervisory powers, scope and procedures of the supervisory commissions, andclearly distinguishing the supervision objects and functions of the supervisorycommissions and the people's procuratorates. although the new criminalprocedure law has made corresponding provisions on the connection of thefunctions of the supervisory commission and the procuratorate, there are alsosome problems: specifically, there are such problems as the incongruity andrelative lack of legislation between the two laws. therefore, in order to solvethe problem of poor connection between the supervisory commission and theprocuratorate at the practical level and realize efficient and smoothconnection, it is necessary to further improve the construction of relevantconnection mechanism.
2. 研究的基本内容、问题解决措施及方案
1.文献分析法
通过图书馆查阅、网络知识库的搜集、以及校园中文发现系统的运用等方式，查阅和分析了有关监察权与检察权的图书、期刊、博硕论文，系统的总结了构建监察与检察协调衔接机制的基础理论，分析了该机制构建的可行性及路径选择。
2.法条分析法
